Government Pork

In 1905, G.K. Chesterton wrote, in Heretics,

People wonder why the novel is the most popular form of literature; people wonder why it is read more than books of science or books of metaphysics. The reason is very simple; it is merely that the novel is more true than they are. Life may sometimes legitimately appear as a book of science. Life may sometimes appear, and with a much greater legitimacy, as a book of metaphysics. But life is always a novel.

As I look around at the ridiculous events surrounding us with the HHS mandate, I want to scream.

I can sign a petition and promote common sense–and so can you!

Other people, though, do better. Karina Fabian shared this brilliant parable-like story with me, and when I read it, I nodded. And when she offered to let me share it here, I couldn’t refuse.

Life is always a novel, indeed.

Government Pork, by Karina Fabian

Once there was a wonderful town full of people who loved to eat, and many wonderful and varied restaurants that served excellent food:  Italian and French, Japanese and Mongolian, Middle Eastern and even a kosher delicatessen.  Not everyone liked every restaurant, of course, and some people even thought particular restaurants were odd, but they appreciated the variety available to all.

There were also a lot of pig farmers in the area, and people enjoyed the fresh pork.  One year, they had a mayor who loved fresh pork.  He thought it was the right of everyone in the town to have pork at any meal they wanted.  “Why,” he’d say,” if there was only one meal I could give my kids, it’d be pork chops!”  Of course, lots of the people loved pork as well, and they applauded his enthusiasm.

One day he sat in his office, thinking about how much he and others liked pork, and he decided that every restaurant should serve pork, at every meal.  Oh, maybe not every individual would want to eat pork, but they deserved the right to have it on their plate so they could choose!  And so, he set out a decree that all restaurants would serve some form of pork in every meal.

Well, the delicatessen and the Middle Eastern restaurant were upset by this.  They couldn’t serve pork—it was against their religions.  So they went to the Mayor and asked to be excused from this rule. “After all,” they said, “people know we never serve pork.”

“But you should.  People have the right to pork.  Some of your customers eat pork.  Even some of your employees enjoy a good ham!”

“And if they wish to, they may–but not in our restaurants,” the owners said.  “It’s against the kind of restaurants we are to serve pork.  And we have customers who do not want pork, who would be offended and do not want to pay for pork.”

“Well, I’m offended that you won’t serve it—and I’m sure other pork lovers agree that your attitude is most disagreeable.”

“Our customers and our employees know where we stand, and they continue to frequent our restaurants and work for us.  We serve them well, but we do not serve them pork.  We have the right to our own menus.   We should not be forced.”

But the mayor stood firm.  “No,” he said.  “Everyone has the right to have pork, and it’s my duty to make sure it’s always available, whether you agree or not.  It’s healthier than beef anyway.  If you don’t like it, you can pay a fine and stop serving food—or you can close down.”

The restaurant managers refused to change their menus.  Many people stood by them—because they, too, would not eat pork and didn’t want to pay for it; or because they agreed that restaurants should choose their own menus; or because they didn’t like the mayor telling people how to run their own businesses.  The movie theaters stood by him, because they were afraid if the Mayor could change menus, he might also start dictating what shows would be played.

The pork lovers, however, were incensed.  How dare the restaurants not give them pork if they wanted it?

“I can’t eat beef; what should I do then?” one demanded.  “Do you just want to send me away to starve?”

“We have other dishes,” they said.  “Our menu and service would be no different than before.  We can feed you many things; just not pork.”

Nonetheless, the press, too, said that the two restaurants would rather let people starve rather than eat pork.

Despite the outcry of the pork lovers, more and more people said, “Let them choose their own menu!”

One day, the Mayor called the restaurant owners into his office.  He had a compromise, he said.

“I won’t make you buy pork.  You don’t have to prepare it, or touch it.  Instead, all restaurant suppliers will have to supply pork to every restaurant, free of charge, and for those that don’t want to serve the pork, suppliers will cook it and put it on every plate themselves.”

“But there would still be pork in our restaurant!” the owners cried.  “Besides, they will increase the price of meat to cover their new expenses.”

“Oh, they wouldn’t do that.  I’d tell them not to.  Besides, the point is you wouldn’t be actually serving pork.  See how well that works?  Everyone gets pork and you can say you never provided it.  And if your patrons don’t want to eat it, they don’t have to; it’s enough that it’s there for them.”

So, problem solved?

A note from Karina: The HHS compromise is no compromise—it’s an escalation, making it impossible not only for the Catholic Church to live according to its beliefs, but any small business that may also believe as the Church does.  I wrote this parable to try to put the debate out of the “contraception/women’s health” light and show the other issues at stake.  Feel free to copy this story and use it on your own blogs.  If you do, please include this link to sign a petition to stop the HHS mandate (or if you know of another petition, include it)

Necessary Boycotting

I’m not a big boycotter. In fact, I don’t think I have ever participated in an actual boycott of products before. But I cannot ignore this:

A pro-life group that monitors the use of cells from babies victimized by abortions is today highlighting a biotech company, Senomyx, which it says produces artificial flavor enhancers using aborted fetal cell lines to test their products.

[snip]

“The company’s key flavor programs focus on the discovery and development of savory, sweet and salt flavor ingredients that are intended to allow for the reduction of MSG, sugar and salt in food and beverage products,” the Senomyx web site says. “Using isolated human taste receptors, we created proprietary taste receptor-based assay systems that provide a biochemical or electronic readout when a flavor ingredient interacts with the receptor.”

Vinnedge says a boycott is important because the collaborating companies provide Senomyx with research and development funding plus royalties on sales of products using their flavor ingredients.

“What they don’t tell the public is that they are using HEK 293 – human embryonic kidney cells taken from an electively aborted baby to produce those receptors,” she said. “They could have easily chosen animal, insect, or other morally obtained human cells expressing the G protein for taste receptors.”

I found out about this thanks to Julie at Happy Catholic, who also compiled a brands cheat sheet. And then Christine conveniently linked to the updates and contact information for each of the companies still involved (PepsiCo and Kraft) in using human embryonic kidney cells for food testing.

I’m not happy about this on many levels. For one thing, this really changes my purchasing habits. For another…SERIOUSLY? USING HUMAN EMBRYONIC CELLS? Supporting abortion’s “byproducts” in this way can NEVER be okay. Never ever ever. Even if it means we can’t eat the foods we’re used to and I have to buck up and do some baking.

I have contacted PepsiCo and Kraft and I hope you will, too. As my husband pointed out in response to my (ongoing, rather loud) ranting about this, boycotting without communicating to the companies doesn’t do any good.

Continuing to Pray for Haiti

Over a year ago, on January 12, was the earthquake that rocked all of us, grabbed our attention, mobilized us to help.

I remember hearing, on an interview on the Catholics Next Door podcast edition, that it would be important to remember Haiti after the hubbub died down. The bishop they were talking to, in fact, mentioned the one year mark. “Remember Haiti next year,” he said. “They’ll still need help.”

I put a little flag in my mind to include something in the parish bulletin, but I forgot. Thanks to the bulletin announcements from the Diocesan Office of Social Concerns, we did have something in our bulletin, though.

It’s so easy to forget after the drama’s over. We all have busy lives, other concerns, new emergencies that grab our attention.

Heidi Jury, who works for Chalice, contacted me a while back about the continuing needs in Haiti. She asked me to post on Facebook about it, but I thought it warranted more attention than that.

Over at Spirit Singing Soul, Heidi writes:

“It’s the women I remember mostly. After ten years, I still vividly see the eyes of two women at a medical clinic in Haiti holding their babies who were so sick from malnutrition. Your sponsorship helps the children you sponsor but sometimes it is their mothers that feel it the most.” – Fr Patrick Cosgrove

Fifteen years ago, Fr Patrick Cosgrove, the president of Chalice, was watching a sponsorship program on television. As he went to phone them to sponsor a child, he stopped and prayed, “Lord, what I want to do is sponsor a child in the Catholic church.” Two weeks later the phone rang with an opportunity to work with a Catholic sponsorship program named CFCA. Fr Pat worked on the board until he started working on his own in 1996 in the basement of a church rectory. The first year, Chalice (then called Christian Childcare International) sponsored less than 500 children. This year, Chalice helped over 42,000 children and aging and was ranked #1 in the International Aid Category in Moneysense Magazine.

This January, Chalice is remembering the Earthquake that affected Haiti on January 12, 2010.  We continue to remember the people of Haiti and pray for God’s continued blessings and protection over them.

There’s an embedded video and more information there. I’ll be joining them in prayer, and I hope you will too.

The Best Anniversary Gift

Yesterday was our seventh anniversary, which only makes it sweeter to introduce you to our newest family member, who made his grand entrance and was nothing less than a gift from God (and an answer to a big sister’s prayer).

Welcome, Joseph William!

November 29

1:37 PM

7 lb, 3 oz

19″

So far, everything’s going swimmingly. Our thanks to everyone for your support and prayers!

What WOULD Mary Do?

It was a strange occurrence that found me at a newsstand today, with a beautiful image of the Virgin Mary looking back at me, the words “What would Mary do?” emblazoned across the cover of Newsweek.

Of course I shelled out the $6 and change to get my own copy. Of course I ignored my children to read it. Of course I should have known better.

That subtitle, “How women can save the Catholic Church from its sins,” should have tipped me off, but I still held a thread of hope.

This week’s Mary Moment Monday was going to be something about Mary in the spring, about how I find her in the cracks and crevices of my lawn, where the tulips have been picked by little fingers and handed to me. Instead, I find myself wading into the murky waters of scandal.

I don’t like debating about this. Really, I don’t think there’s a debate. I don’t keep quiet because I support it, but because I’m praying, and, honestly, I don’t think I add anything to the conversation.

As for the role of women, which this article maintains is the problem — perhaps, had there been women in the hierarchy, we could have avoided these scandals (Really?) — I have to just shake my head. In our parish, which I’ve been heavily involved in, behind the scenes, for the last six years, women are the cogs in the wheel. In fact, if I took attendance, last I checked, it takes both men and women. If there’s a woman in the pew or at an event, there’s a chance there’s a man somewhere supporting her choice or decision to spend her time there. Maybe he’s her father, the one who raised her Catholic, or her husband, or a big brother. He might be a priest who struck a chord with her (not in a scandalous way, mind you) or a deacon who encouraged her to go to college when everyone else told her it would be a waste of her time.

The Church is made up of men, yes. Priests are men, yes. Let’s not debate whether women need to priests or what Jesus meant. Let’s not cite things that aren’t considered valid to all of us.

But behind those men in the Church, there are women. Plenty of them. They raised those men, encouraged those men, and maybe, years ago, dated those men.

Believe it or not, you can be celibate and still have an idea of what it means not to be celibate. There’s beauty in that. In fact, it gives me a greater respect for these men (and women) who choose celibacy. It’s hard. It’s a sacrifice. That’s what makes it such a discernment.

The real problem is: our Church is made up of humans. And there’s really no way around it.

Said far better, by Jen at Conversion Diary:

This latest turn of events has only been a reminder of the age-old mystery that I wrestled with for so long, that humans have been wrestling with for the past two thousand years: that God exists, and even came down to walk among us, and yet he did not stop the suffering. He didn’t take away a single person’s free will — not even those whom he guides to speak on his behalf — and did not exempt one person from the potential to experience the worst kind of suffering. Not innocent children. Not even his own beloved Son. The way he dealt with suffering was to plunge himself into the heart of it, to come down and suffer with us, and for us. Nothing more. Nothing less.

What I’ve found is that, if you can muster up the courage to face that truth head-on, to accept it with all its weight, and resist the urge to run away, it is there that you will encounter Christ.

(It’s worth taking the time to read that entire post, “Safe Miracles,” which is Jen’s take on the scandals as a convert. She writes a lot that makes me nod, though my own experience is slightly different.)

In the interest of giving you something else to read that will hearten you and give you accurate, enlightening information, why not read George Weigel’s article in the same issue?

Updated, thanks to Erin M. in the comments: Here’s the link to the original article.

Time for Health Care Action

The health care debate comes to American parishes this weekend, with the U.S. Bishops asking ALL parishes to run the following bulletin insert, spoken about on this page.  It’s a simple message to take action and use a link the bishops provide from their website to send messages to Congress.  Its very easy to use.
I’m going to post the information from the PDF, which you can find here, if you prefer to read it directly from the USCCB.  This page, which has an easy to use GREEN BUTTON to click and send a note to your congress people. The beauty of this is that the link does the mailing for you automatically.

Many thanks to Pat Gohn of Among Women for tipping us off to this.  (My parish, for one, did not get the memo…or our deadlines are just longer than most other bulletins.)

Picture 8
Tell Congress: Remove Abortion Funding & Mandates from Needed Health Care Reform

Congress is preparing to debate health care reform legislation on the House and Senate floors.  Genuine health care reform should protect the life and dignity of all people from the moment of conception until natural death. The U.S. bishops’ conference has concluded that all committee-approved bills are seriously deficient on the issues of abortion and conscience, and do not provide adequate access to health care for immigrants and the poor. The bills will have to change or the bishops have pledged to oppose them.

Our nation is at a crossroads. Policies adopted in health care reform will have an impact for good or ill for years to come. None of the bills retains longstanding current policies against abortion funding or abortion coverage mandates, and none fully protects conscience rights in health care.

As the U.S. bishops’ letter of October 8 states:
“No one should be required to pay for or participate in abortion. It is essential that the legislation clearly apply to this new program longstanding and widely supported federal restrictions on abortion funding and mandates, and protections for rights of conscience.  No current bill meets this test…. If acceptable language in these areas cannot be found,  we will have to oppose the health care bill vigorously.”

For the full text of this letter and more information on proposed legislation and the bishops’ advocacy for authentic health care reform, visit: www.usccb.org/healthcare.

Congressional leaders are attempting to put together final bills for floor consideration. Please contact your Representative and Senators today and urge them to fix these bills with the pro-life amendments noted below. Otherwise much needed health care reform will have to be opposed. Health care reform should be about saving lives, not destroying them.

ACTION:  Contact Members through e-mail, phone calls or FAX letters.
- To send a pre-written, instant e-mail to Congress go to www.usccb.org/action.
- Call the U.S. Capitol switchboard at: 202-224-3121, or call your Members’ local offices.
- Full contact info can be found on Members’ web sites at www.house.gov & www.senate.gov.

MESSAGE to SENATE:
“During floor debate on the health care reform bill, please support an amendment to incorporate longstanding policies against abortion funding and in favor of conscience rights.  If these serious concerns are not addressed, the final bill should be opposed.”

MESSAGE to HOUSE:
“Please support the Stupak Amendment that addresses essential pro-life concerns on abortion funding and conscience rights in the health care reform bill. Help ensure that the Rule for the bill allows a vote on this amendment. If these serious concerns are not addressed, the final bill should be opposed.”

WHEN:  Both House and Senate are preparing for floor votes now. Act today! Thank you!

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...